Karma: a reward for... silence?
so you'll notice — I send this post in "Ideas for website" just because "blog Discussion Habra" no, but to create the somehow stiff there is no special need.
/ > What is karma? What is any method of digital assessment of human activity on any site? Right, promoting to implementation of specific activities that you would like to see on the website of its creators.
What would you like to see habré Deniskin and Korovkin? Praaavilno, a lot of good articles and translations, thereto a lot of good reviews. "Goodness" is determined by other users, voting for articles, comments and users themselves.
This mechanism works for example the so — Gabru better to see good translations on the forum than good original articles, so the threshold output for them below — and for the links above because references are usually gugino. Good, and so I get enough points, and will be released onGagne home.
Maybe it's an individual practice, but the abundance of experience "for the top pros, karma minus" suggests that it is not. Three days on habré I posted a topic three, two of them appeared in the main. The story unfolds as follows — while the topic hangs in the "new," his little comment, vote, karma increases. Once it goes over a bunch of cons in karma. Logic, obviously, so while he was in the General flow of "new", it is read only by those who want to — when he goes home, he read everything, and whose opinions are negative, they Express it not with angry comments or minus the topography and spit in karma.
It appears that the "system" provokes me,go and kill yourself up the wall writing topics "small" scale, which will not work and just one after another will gradually complement the karma.
Do not think, this is not a personal whine about the karma — I my to write in the collective blogs enough, and more is not necessary — but it seems to me that the problem of mass.
Conclusion overall: personally, I want the writing popular, discussed, plyusuem content "encouraged" in haberzetel concepts affect karma in a positive way.
Conclusion private: maybe it's better that karma was taken out of the pros and cons of the materials and comments, not abstract, spitting and impulsive pros?
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru
/ > What is karma? What is any method of digital assessment of human activity on any site? Right, promoting to implementation of specific activities that you would like to see on the website of its creators.
What would you like to see habré Deniskin and Korovkin? Praaavilno, a lot of good articles and translations, thereto a lot of good reviews. "Goodness" is determined by other users, voting for articles, comments and users themselves.
This mechanism works for example the so — Gabru better to see good translations on the forum than good original articles, so the threshold output for them below — and for the links above because references are usually gugino. Good, and so I get enough points, and will be released on
Maybe it's an individual practice, but the abundance of experience "for the top pros, karma minus" suggests that it is not. Three days on habré I posted a topic three, two of them appeared in the main. The story unfolds as follows — while the topic hangs in the "new," his little comment, vote, karma increases. Once it goes over a bunch of cons in karma. Logic, obviously, so while he was in the General flow of "new", it is read only by those who want to — when he goes home, he read everything, and whose opinions are negative, they Express it not with angry comments or minus the topography and spit in karma.
It appears that the "system" provokes me,
Do not think, this is not a personal whine about the karma — I my to write in the collective blogs enough, and more is not necessary — but it seems to me that the problem of mass.
Conclusion overall: personally, I want the writing popular, discussed, plyusuem content "encouraged" in haberzetel concepts affect karma in a positive way.
Conclusion private: maybe it's better that karma was taken out of the pros and cons of the materials and comments, not abstract, spitting and impulsive pros?
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий